My SFMA: A Case Study - Multi-Segmental Flexion Breakouts

Today's post is the fourth part of my self-SFMA(Selective Functional Movement Assessment) case study series.  Specifically, We will look at and break out my dysfunctional Multi-segmental Flexion movement pattern from my SFMA Top Tier Post.  

I'm jealous of those that can do this.

Here are the links for the first three posts of this series:
SFMA Top Tier Pattern Assessment

SFMA CervicalSpine Pattern Breakouts

SFMA Upper Extremity Pattern Breakouts

Assessment:

The SFMA works by assessing 7 general top tier movement tests. All tests are rated and ranked by two broad categories of dysfunctional or functional, and then two sub-categorizations of painful or non-painful. This means there are four basic appraisals of FN, DN, FP or DP. From there you perform a "breakout" of each dysfunctional pattern to determine the cause of dysfunction. Dysfunctional movement patterns are broken down using an algorithm that funnels and filters the problem into either a mobility dysfunction or a stability &/or motor control dysfunction (SMCD). 

 

This video will look at the dysfunctional multi-segmental flexion pattern.  Here is the latest breakout video:

Results:

Multi-Segmental Flexion Top Tier = DN (Unable to touch toes. Why? We don't know yet. Other Criteria for passing: Uniform Spinal Curve, Posterior Weight Shift, < 70 degree Sacral Angle)

Single Leg Forward Bend Test = Bilateral DN, yet symmetrical (Still Unable to reach the toes or floor. Why? We don't know yet. Proceed to the next test.) 

This test helped to determine if the forward bend was an asymmetrical or symmetrical dysfunction…in the presence of pain with the top tier assessment we could also use this test to check for symmetry with pain provocation.

Long Sitting Test = DN (Still unable to reach toes. Why? I don’t know yet but we did pick up on a few things.)

We still do not have a clear cause of dysfunction yet, however we do know that I cannot touch my toes and I do have < 80 degree Sacral Angle. This would indicate limited hip flexion and/or limited spinal flexion, or both.

If I had been FN with this test we would have proceeded to the rolling patterns to check for a fundamental motor control dysfunction.

Active Straight Leg Raise Test: Right=DN, Left=DN (Looking for at least 70 degrees of Hip Flexion)

Passive Straight Leg Raise Test: Right=DN, Left=DN (Looking for at least 80 degrees Hip Flexion and to be within 10 degrees of the Active SLR)

It is observed that my passive SLR has more than a 10 degree difference from the active SLR. This would indicate a possibility of a core stability, hip flexion strength problem, excessive hamstring tone, guarding or a hip mobility dysfunction.

Supine Knee to Chest Holding Thighs Test = DN (Unable to bring knees and thighs to chest while supine.) This test is used to check the mobility of the hips while they are in an unloaded or non-weight-bearing position. Doing this also helps to differentiate a difference between hamstring mobility and hip mobility dysfunctions.

Breakout Findings: If we follow the breakouts one would deduce that I have a hip joint mobility dysfunction or a posterior chain tissue extensibility dysfunction or both…as well as a possible hip flexion strength or SMCD dysfunction. But that isn’t as important considering that we would need to treat the mobility dysfunction before addressing any SMCDs.

Do you have any ideas/suggestions/thoughts? Let me know in the comments below!

Read More

My SFMA: A Case Study - Upper Extremity Breakouts

Today's post is the third part of my self-SFMA(Selective Functional Movement Assessment) case study series.  Specifically, We will look at and break out any dysfunctional upper extremity movement patterns from my SFMA Top Tier Post.  


In the first post/video, I was dysfunctional/non-painful (DN) for the Upper Extremity Pattern One (Combination of Extension/Adduction/Internal Rotation of the shoulder).  However, I was functional/non-painful (FN) for Upper Extremity Pattern Two (Combination of Flexion/Abduction/External Rotation of the shoulder). In case you missed it, here are the 7 top tier tests again. You can also check out the cervical spine patterns and breakout assessment here.

Read More

My SFMA: A Case Study - Cervical Breakouts

Time to make an assessment of myself

Today's post is second part of my self-SFMA(Selective Functional Movement Assessment) case study series.  Specifically, We will look at the dysfunctional cervical spine movement patterns from my SFMA Top Tier Post.  In the first post/video, I was dysfunctional/non-painful (DN) for the Cervical Flexion Pattern, and the Cervical Rotation Pattern to both the Right & Left.  However, I was functional/non-painful (FN) for Cervical Extension. In case you missed it, here is the 7 top tier tests again.

The SFMA works by assessing 7 general top tier movement tests. From there you perform a "breakout" of each dysfunctional pattern to determine the cause of dysfunction. Dysfunction movement patterns are broken down using an algorithm that funnels and filters the problem into either a mobility dysfunction or a stability &/or motor control dysfunction (SMCD).

Assessment:
This video will look at the dysfunctional cervical spine patterns. Specifically, cervical flexion and cervical rotation to the left and right. I was functional for the cervical extension pattern so that pattern does not require a breakout assessment. Here is the breakout video:

Results:
Cervical Flexion Top Tier = DN (Unable to bring chin to sternum. Why? We don't know yet.)

Active Supine Cervical Flexion Test = DN (Still Unable to bring chin to sternum. Why? We don't know yet.)
If I was now FN we would know that there is a postural and motor control dysfunction or stability/motor control dysfunction...or both, affecting cervical flexion. This includes the c-spine, T-spine, and shoulder girdle postural dysfunction. Laying supine removed the postural and stability requirements of the gravity dependent/loaded standing position from the top-tier tests

Passive Supine Cervical Flexion Test = FN (Chin is now to sternum)
We can now assume the cause of the dysfunction was due to an active cervical spine flexion stability dysfunction or motor control dysfunction...or both. We know it is not a mobility issue because I had full motion when all stability and motor control requirements were removed and the movement was performed passively. If it was due to mobility reasons then my GF would not have been able to passively bring my chin to my chest. Mobility problems always present with consistent findings!

Cervical Rotation Top Tier = DN to the Left & Right (Can not rotate chin to mid-clavicle or at least 80 degrees, Why? We don't know yet)
This test no longer requires this degree of rotation and the ability to bring the chin to the clavicle, at least this is how I was instructed in October of 2013.

Active Supine Cervical Rotation Test = FN (At least 80 degrees of rotation bilaterally without a significant asymmetry)
We now know that the dysfunction was related to a postural and motor control dysfunction or a stability and motor control dysfunction...or both. This is why my top tier cervical spine rotation test was dysfunctional, not because of my perceived tissue "tightness."


Treatment:
It is said that there are many ways to skin a cat...that being said the SFMA is a tool or a system of assessment. It is not a specific approach to treatment. However, there are general guidelines based off of the findings and it also lays a road map of treatment for you(eg. mobility before stability, working your way down the top tier tests). Specifically, in my case I do not have any mobility dysfunctions within the cervical spine but if I follow the philosophy of the SFMA then I need to address the SMCD of the cervical flexion pattern before attempting to correct SMCD dysfunction of the cervical rotation.

There are many avenues for treating this dysfunction from dry needling to IASTM to MDT principles to using the 4x4 Matrix or etc. I can't advocate that one approach will be better for addressing my dysfunction than another...but I do have a system of assessment to judge the efficacy of each potential intervention. Perhaps IASTM and MDT combined will work great for 90% of my patients but I don't know that...all I need to know is how to assess-intervene-reassess. Oh and I should probably stay within my practice act, so use what tools you have and those that you are comfortable with.

Thoughts? Do you think my breakouts and assessment have been accurate so far? What would you do with me? I know what I would do....finish the SFMA breakouts, first. Come back as I continue to break out my many dysfunctional movement patterns.

Read More